Abilene: freshness finding
Source review October 4 distinguishes historical milestones from current completion. Later operating results, water reporting and individual vacancies remain unverified.
Join talent networkOUR ACCOUNTABILITY SCORECARD
Show the evidence.
Show the gaps.
Finish the work.
Follow the project. Find your opportunity. See what your community gains.
Progress backed by evidence.
The original content inventory was recorded October 4, 2026. Latest scoped review: October 4, 2026. Scoped source and pathway reviews now cover all three priority towns. Later project outcomes, additional individual opportunities and measured benefit outcomes remain open. This is not a certification of the whole site or every current job opening.
Scope7 measures · 3 priority towns · 21 checksNext manual review targetOctober 11, 2026 · Overdue
6Meets standard
15Partial
0Needs work
0Not checked
Counts describe the current recorded checks, not an overall quality percentage or a ranking against other websites. Pending work earns no completed credit. Review targets are manual; no automatic review or alert delivery is running from this scorecard.
Town-by-town checks.
| Measure / acceptance standard | Abilene ↗ | Haskell County ↗ | San Angelo ↗ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy Every material claim has a direct source, source date, checked date and confidence label; discrepancies and unknowns are recorded. | Partial October 4 milestone recheck retains June local count, separates September portfolio total and records end-2026/mid-2027 targets without declaring completion. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Partial October 4 recheck preserves Google construction, Quantum status discrepancy and separate County agreement. Later compute commissioning and separate construction start remain unverified. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Partial October 4 City recheck confirms the overview’s within-city application qualification and dated policy milestones; later executed agreement and buildout remain unverified. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → |
| Freshness Active project and decision records have an individual review within 7 days, or an explicit overdue/unverified label. Stable institutional resources have a review within 30 days. | Partial October 4 source review is dated and historical company milestones are labeled. Later completion and project-wide water reporting remain unverified. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Partial Dated scoped review added October 4; historical construction reports and the conflicting Quantum status are labeled. Later milestones remain unverified. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Partial October 4 scoped source review added; June incentive information remains historical and later execution is unverified. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → |
| Local usefulness The town guide answers what is happening, who is hiring, how businesses participate, what residents can influence and who benefits, with evidence or explicit unknowns. | Meets standard Five local questions now have answers, original pathways and explicit unknowns. Employer vacancy, bid and new hearing availability are not implied. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Meets standard Five local questions have original workforce, County and vendor-commitment sources with explicit vacancy, workshop and hearing unknowns. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Meets standard Five questions connect City participation instructions, workforce services and institutional training with explicit vacancy, vendor and delivery unknowns. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → |
| Promise follow-through Benefits have a named partner, dates, evidence and a status separating commitment, reported delivery and recipient-confirmed results. | Partial Follow-up checked graduation and general programme sources. Abilene cohort placement data remain unverified; published the exact aggregate evidence needed to close the question. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Partial Added recipient acknowledgement of Google’s separate $300,000 donation. Two donors and generator locations stay distinct. Later facility/infrastructure reports do not confirm commissioning; equipment and outcome evidence remain open. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Partial A proposed community benefit compact is labeled as a proposal. An evidence-backed delivery register remains to be built. Source/pathway review: pendingInspect page / next work → |
| Working opportunities Relevant employer, procurement and training links are checked and dated. Specific openings and bids have deadlines/status; expired items are closed. | Partial Official TSTC series lists October 15 Abilene Discovery Day, distinct from an MEI intake. Next class dates, seats and cohort-specific employment remain unverified; prior vendor pathways retained. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Partial Google Haskell Server Operations Manager listing visible October 4; older technician listing returned Job not found. County vendor commitment is not an open bid; training intake and workshop dates remain unverified. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Partial Howard College enquiry route and interest form visible. Explicit 2025 and yearless course dates are qualified; current intake seats, project vacancies and bids remain unverified. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → |
| Corrections A correction route exists and material corrections have a dated issue, evidence, action and resolution record. | Meets standard October 4 correction records the schedule and historical training-intake issues, evidence, action and unresolved verification with a next-check target. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Meets standard Dated register records the old announcement-stage summary, source-backed changes and unresolved status/delivery questions with an October 11 target. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Meets standard October 4 register records removal of unqualified directory scale, City scope, evidence and action. Later executed agreements and benefit verification remain open. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → |
| Competitive gaps A dated comparison identifies useful missing information, verifies original sources and records whether each gap was filled or remains open. | Partial October 4 comparison of DPR, Crusoe, Oracle and the project hub exposed missing campus distinctions, trainee and vendor pathways, and schedule conflict. Added coverage; broader competitor audit remains open. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Partial October 4 comparison with Texas AI Data Center Intelligence Hub and original sources added construction context and County records. Third-party capacity estimates were not adopted; complete inventory remains open. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → | Partial October 4 comparison of Texas AI Data Center Intelligence Hub with City sources records proposed scale versus filed design. Participation/training routes added; wider county coverage remains open. Source/pathway review: October 4, 2026Inspect page / next work → |
Haskell County: freshness finding
Scoped source review October 4. Google construction and separate County agreement records are dated; current compute operations and Quantum status discrepancy remain open.
San Angelo: freshness finding
Scoped source review October 4. The City application qualification is recorded; June incentive information remains historical. October 9 riverfront concept gallery added and labeled independently; project-status facts retain the October 4 review.
Next actions and completion evidence.
Responsible desk: DataCentersTX editorial/project team. Dates are work targets, not promised delivery dates. Close an item only when the completion evidence is recorded.
Activate advertiser subscription billing
Advertising and sponsorship
October 5: monthly prices and sandbox portal configured; website approval, private invitation, checkout, invoice and cancellation routes built. Signed webhook registered and its signing secret stored in hosting. Migrated-D1 tests passed for renewal, failure, duplicate/out-of-order events, consent, risk review and banner holds. October 6: owner sign-in email configured with explicit confirmation; checkout return origin and existing sandbox webhook updated to datacenterstx.com. October 7: live-only placement rendering and private recorded activity reports implemented with Worker/D1 checks; separate live webhook configured. Runtime API key remains missing; hosted Stripe end-to-end and browser delivery remain unverified.
Done when: Activate and test recurring signup, renewal, cancellation, payment failure and receipts; verify one banner slot per city, actual ad delivery/reporting and free-school review without billing.
Review affected coverage →Resolve past dates presented as future decisions
Calendar and tracker
October 4: outdated wording corrected and Town original notice graphic retrieved. Current Tomahawk proposal withdrawal verified; dated resolution preserves item-number discrepancy and prior unresolved assessment.
Done when: Verify the outcome from the governing body; update or archive the item with sources and a dated correction.
Review affected coverage →Audit project claims and review dates
All three priority towns
Source ledgers now cover all three towns. Legacy claims, later operating results, incentive outcomes and full county inventories remain open.
Done when: Record dated original-source checks, conflicts, unknowns and current status for each material claim.
Review affected coverage →Complete the five-question local guide
Abilene → Haskell County → San Angelo
October 4: all three towns now answer the five local questions with direct pathways and explicit unknowns.
Done when: Each town answers the five local questions with evidence or explicitly identified unknowns.
Review affected coverage →Check jobs, procurement and training pathways
All three priority towns
Pathways in all three towns reviewed October 4. One Haskell employer listing and visible forms are now documented in a dated register; other vacancies, intakes, bids and vendor workshops remain open.
Done when: Publish checked dates, original application sources and deadlines/status where relevant.
Review affected coverage →Add recipient evidence and benefit follow-up
Community stories and priority towns
TSTC graduation and Haskell hospital recipient sources added. Historical training completion is distinguished from hiring, and donation acknowledgement from installation; separate Google donation and four evidence questions now documented. Other recipients and measured outcomes remain open.
Done when: Record recipient sources, commitment/delivery status, next check and unresolved questions.
Review affected coverage →Establish a dated correction register
Sitewide
October 4: four dated issue/evidence/action records distinguish corrected wording from unresolved factual follow-up.
Done when: Log material issues, supporting evidence, action dates and resolution without inventing past corrections.
Review affected coverage →Compare local coverage with other sources
All three priority towns
Dated scoped source comparisons now cover all three towns. Broader competitor coverage, original capacity evidence and complete county inventories remain open.
Done when: Document competitor/source review dates, useful gaps and original-source verification before adding claims.
Review affected coverage →How we hold the scorecard accountable.
- Meets standard
- Acceptance criteria satisfied with dated evidence and working relevant pathways. Passing a website build alone does not qualify.
- Partial
- Useful content or controls exist, but the full standard has not been verified.
- Needs work
- A specific gap, outdated date or missing control has been identified.
- Not checked
- The required audit has not been performed. This is not a finding that the project or benefit does not exist.
Review targets
- Weekly: review this scorecard, overdue records, open corrections and the next three priorities.
- Active project and decision records: review within 7 days; stable institutional resources within 30 days.
- Material new information: target review within one business day after identification.
- Reported errors: target initial assessment within two business days; record unresolved evidence and next action.
- Before every publication: document what improved, supporting evidence, validation and remaining unchecked items.
These are operating targets adopted with this scorecard. Update the stored assessment after an actual review; the page does not automatically verify sources or advance a check to completed. If a target is missed, keep it visible and record why.
Archived baseline · October 4, 2026
Original assessment retained: 0 Meets standard · 10 Partial · 4 Needs work · 7 Not checked.
- Abilene / accuracy: Partial. Project source links and planned-capacity labels exist; claim-by-claim current verification is pending.
- Haskell County / accuracy: Partial. Supporting sources and announced-campus labels exist; current source reconciliation is pending.
- San Angelo / accuracy: Partial. Public-record sections distinguish proposals and recruitment candidates; current assertions still need dated source checks.
- Abilene / freshness: Needs work. Displayed review period is August 2026, older than the active-project target.
- Haskell County / freshness: Needs work. A shared directory review date does not establish individual claim freshness.
- San Angelo / freshness: Needs work. Add an explicit factual review date and resolve time-sensitive statements.
- Abilene / local: Partial. Project, work, training, directory and concern sections exist; current public decisions and a five-question town summary remain to be completed.
- Haskell County / local: Needs work. Project sources and general opportunity links exist; local hiring, training, procurement and participation details need deeper coverage.
- San Angelo / local: Partial. Workforce pathways, directory and planning framework exist; current hiring and decision opportunities require verification.
- Abilene / follow: Partial. Two outreach records exist on the community page, attributed to Crusoe. Recipient confirmation and follow-up outcomes remain open.
- Haskell County / follow: Not checked. No Haskell-specific delivered-benefit record was identified in the initial community section. Research is pending; this is not evidence that outreach is absent.
- San Angelo / follow: Partial. A proposed community benefit compact is labeled as a proposal. An evidence-backed delivery register remains to be built.
- Abilene / opportunities: Not checked. Career and training links are present; external availability and individual openings were not audited in this baseline.
- Haskell County / opportunities: Not checked. General opportunity pathways exist; local source links and current availability need checking.
- San Angelo / opportunities: Not checked. Institutional workforce links exist; current programs and job availability need checking.
- Abilene / corrections: Partial. Sitewide contact and correction routes exist. A town-specific completed correction history has not been established.
- Haskell County / corrections: Partial. Sitewide contact and correction routes exist. A town-specific completed correction history has not been established.
- San Angelo / corrections: Partial. Sitewide contact and correction routes exist. A town-specific completed correction history has not been established.
- Abilene / gaps: Not checked. A general competitor comparison exists; a documented Abilene claim and coverage comparison remains open.
- Haskell County / gaps: Not checked. A documented Haskell County claim and coverage comparison remains open.
- San Angelo / gaps: Not checked. A documented San Angelo claim and coverage comparison remains open.
These are the original inventory assessments, preserved separately from current reviewed checks.
Archived local-guide assessment before opportunity follow-up · October 4, 2026
- Abilene / accuracy: Partial. Reviewed original and additional campus reports; source dates, conflicting schedules and water metric limits are recorded. Full legacy claim audit and later operating results remain open.
- Haskell County / accuracy: Partial. October 4 original-source review distinguishes Google construction, Quantum energy capacity and a separate Crusoe-linked County agreement. Operating compute, full county inventory and disputed energy status remain open.
- San Angelo / accuracy: Partial. City overview and adopted water ordinance reviewed October 4. Within-city application status, developer projections and historical incentive statement separated. Concept sections and later agreement outcomes remain unaudited.
- Abilene / freshness: Partial. October 4 source review is dated and historical company milestones are labeled. Later completion and project-wide water reporting remain unverified.
- Haskell County / freshness: Partial. Dated scoped review added October 4; historical construction reports and the conflicting Quantum status are labeled. Later milestones remain unverified.
- San Angelo / freshness: Partial. October 4 scoped source review added; June incentive information remains historical and later execution is unverified.
- Abilene / local: Meets standard. Five local questions now have answers, original pathways and explicit unknowns. Employer vacancy, bid and new hearing availability are not implied.
- Haskell County / local: Meets standard. Five local questions have original workforce, County and vendor-commitment sources with explicit vacancy, workshop and hearing unknowns.
- San Angelo / local: Meets standard. Five questions connect City participation instructions, workforce services and institutional training with explicit vacancy, vendor and delivery unknowns.
- Abilene / follow: Partial. Two outreach records exist on the community page, attributed to Crusoe. Recipient confirmation and follow-up outcomes remain open.
- Haskell County / follow: Partial. Added Intersect company-reported school/EMS/public-space support with named recipients and a next-check target. Recipient confirmation, payment dates and measured results remain open.
- San Angelo / follow: Partial. A proposed community benefit compact is labeled as a proposal. An evidence-backed delivery register remains to be built.
- Abilene / opportunities: Partial. Reviewed employer, procurement, workforce, program and City pathways October 4. Dynamic vacancy contents and next TSTC intake remain unverified; the March intake is labeled historical.
- Haskell County / opportunities: Partial. Employer, regional job/training assistance and County vendor provisions reviewed October 4. No local vacancy, apprenticeship intake, open bid or workshop date was confirmed.
- San Angelo / opportunities: Partial. City agenda/comment, Concho Valley workforce, Howard College and ASU routes reviewed October 4. Class seats, specific project openings and procurement availability remain unverified.
- Abilene / corrections: Meets standard. October 4 correction records the schedule and historical training-intake issues, evidence, action and unresolved verification with a next-check target.
- Haskell County / corrections: Meets standard. Dated register records the old announcement-stage summary, source-backed changes and unresolved status/delivery questions with an October 11 target.
- San Angelo / corrections: Meets standard. October 4 register records removal of unqualified directory scale, City scope, evidence and action. Later executed agreements and benefit verification remain open.
- Abilene / gaps: Partial. October 4 comparison of DPR, Crusoe, Oracle and the project hub exposed missing campus distinctions, trainee and vendor pathways, and schedule conflict. Added coverage; broader competitor audit remains open.
- Haskell County / gaps: Partial. October 4 comparison with Texas AI Data Center Intelligence Hub and original sources added construction context and County records. Third-party capacity estimates were not adopted; complete inventory remains open.
- San Angelo / gaps: Partial. October 4 comparison of Texas AI Data Center Intelligence Hub with City sources records proposed scale versus filed design. Participation/training routes added; wider county coverage remains open.
Archived opportunity assessment before outcome follow-up · October 4, 2026
- Abilene / accuracy: Partial. Reviewed original and additional campus reports; source dates, conflicting schedules and water metric limits are recorded. Full legacy claim audit and later operating results remain open.
- Haskell County / accuracy: Partial. October 4 original-source review distinguishes Google construction, Quantum energy capacity and a separate Crusoe-linked County agreement. Operating compute, full county inventory and disputed energy status remain open.
- San Angelo / accuracy: Partial. City overview and adopted water ordinance reviewed October 4. Within-city application status, developer projections and historical incentive statement separated. Concept sections and later agreement outcomes remain unaudited.
- Abilene / freshness: Partial. October 4 source review is dated and historical company milestones are labeled. Later completion and project-wide water reporting remain unverified.
- Haskell County / freshness: Partial. Dated scoped review added October 4; historical construction reports and the conflicting Quantum status are labeled. Later milestones remain unverified.
- San Angelo / freshness: Partial. October 4 scoped source review added; June incentive information remains historical and later execution is unverified.
- Abilene / local: Meets standard. Five local questions now have answers, original pathways and explicit unknowns. Employer vacancy, bid and new hearing availability are not implied.
- Haskell County / local: Meets standard. Five local questions have original workforce, County and vendor-commitment sources with explicit vacancy, workshop and hearing unknowns.
- San Angelo / local: Meets standard. Five questions connect City participation instructions, workforce services and institutional training with explicit vacancy, vendor and delivery unknowns.
- Abilene / follow: Partial. TSTC recipient/provider report added: 12 historical graduates and announced statewide investment. Graduate employment, disbursement and Crusoe outreach recipient confirmations remain open.
- Haskell County / follow: Partial. Hospital recipient acknowledgement added for Intersect backup-power donation. Installation and emergency performance remain unverified; separate school/EMS claims remain company-attributed.
- San Angelo / follow: Partial. A proposed community benefit compact is labeled as a proposal. An evidence-backed delivery register remains to be built.
- Abilene / opportunities: Partial. DPR prequalification questionnaire and project vendor-interest form visible. TSTC enquiry reviewed with 12-week general versus 15-week historical cohort distinction. Current Abilene vacancies, intake seats and open bids remain unverified.
- Haskell County / opportunities: Partial. Google Haskell Server Operations Manager listing visible October 4; older technician listing returned Job not found. County vendor commitment is not an open bid; training intake and workshop dates remain unverified.
- San Angelo / opportunities: Partial. Howard College enquiry route and interest form visible. Explicit 2025 and yearless course dates are qualified; current intake seats, project vacancies and bids remain unverified.
- Abilene / corrections: Meets standard. October 4 correction records the schedule and historical training-intake issues, evidence, action and unresolved verification with a next-check target.
- Haskell County / corrections: Meets standard. Dated register records the old announcement-stage summary, source-backed changes and unresolved status/delivery questions with an October 11 target.
- San Angelo / corrections: Meets standard. October 4 register records removal of unqualified directory scale, City scope, evidence and action. Later executed agreements and benefit verification remain open.
- Abilene / gaps: Partial. October 4 comparison of DPR, Crusoe, Oracle and the project hub exposed missing campus distinctions, trainee and vendor pathways, and schedule conflict. Added coverage; broader competitor audit remains open.
- Haskell County / gaps: Partial. October 4 comparison with Texas AI Data Center Intelligence Hub and original sources added construction context and County records. Third-party capacity estimates were not adopted; complete inventory remains open.
- San Angelo / gaps: Partial. October 4 comparison of Texas AI Data Center Intelligence Hub with City sources records proposed scale versus filed design. Participation/training routes added; wider county coverage remains open.
Archived outcome assessment before milestone verification · October 4, 2026
- Abilene / accuracy: Partial. Reviewed original and additional campus reports; source dates, conflicting schedules and water metric limits are recorded. Full legacy claim audit and later operating results remain open.
- Haskell County / accuracy: Partial. October 4 original-source review distinguishes Google construction, Quantum energy capacity and a separate Crusoe-linked County agreement. Operating compute, full county inventory and disputed energy status remain open.
- San Angelo / accuracy: Partial. City overview and adopted water ordinance reviewed October 4. Within-city application status, developer projections and historical incentive statement separated. Concept sections and later agreement outcomes remain unaudited.
- Abilene / freshness: Partial. October 4 source review is dated and historical company milestones are labeled. Later completion and project-wide water reporting remain unverified.
- Haskell County / freshness: Partial. Dated scoped review added October 4; historical construction reports and the conflicting Quantum status are labeled. Later milestones remain unverified.
- San Angelo / freshness: Partial. October 4 scoped source review added; June incentive information remains historical and later execution is unverified.
- Abilene / local: Meets standard. Five local questions now have answers, original pathways and explicit unknowns. Employer vacancy, bid and new hearing availability are not implied.
- Haskell County / local: Meets standard. Five local questions have original workforce, County and vendor-commitment sources with explicit vacancy, workshop and hearing unknowns.
- San Angelo / local: Meets standard. Five questions connect City participation instructions, workforce services and institutional training with explicit vacancy, vendor and delivery unknowns.
- Abilene / follow: Partial. Follow-up checked graduation and general programme sources. Abilene cohort placement data remain unverified; published the exact aggregate evidence needed to close the question.
- Haskell County / follow: Partial. Added recipient acknowledgement of Google’s separate $300,000 donation. Two donors and generator locations stay distinct. Later facility/infrastructure reports do not confirm commissioning; equipment and outcome evidence remain open.
- San Angelo / follow: Partial. A proposed community benefit compact is labeled as a proposal. An evidence-backed delivery register remains to be built.
- Abilene / opportunities: Partial. Official TSTC series lists October 15 Abilene Discovery Day, distinct from an MEI intake. Next class dates, seats and cohort-specific employment remain unverified; prior vendor pathways retained.
- Haskell County / opportunities: Partial. Google Haskell Server Operations Manager listing visible October 4; older technician listing returned Job not found. County vendor commitment is not an open bid; training intake and workshop dates remain unverified.
- San Angelo / opportunities: Partial. Howard College enquiry route and interest form visible. Explicit 2025 and yearless course dates are qualified; current intake seats, project vacancies and bids remain unverified.
- Abilene / corrections: Meets standard. October 4 correction records the schedule and historical training-intake issues, evidence, action and unresolved verification with a next-check target.
- Haskell County / corrections: Meets standard. Dated register records the old announcement-stage summary, source-backed changes and unresolved status/delivery questions with an October 11 target.
- San Angelo / corrections: Meets standard. October 4 register records removal of unqualified directory scale, City scope, evidence and action. Later executed agreements and benefit verification remain open.
- Abilene / gaps: Partial. October 4 comparison of DPR, Crusoe, Oracle and the project hub exposed missing campus distinctions, trainee and vendor pathways, and schedule conflict. Added coverage; broader competitor audit remains open.
- Haskell County / gaps: Partial. October 4 comparison with Texas AI Data Center Intelligence Hub and original sources added construction context and County records. Third-party capacity estimates were not adopted; complete inventory remains open.
- San Angelo / gaps: Partial. October 4 comparison of Texas AI Data Center Intelligence Hub with City sources records proposed scale versus filed design. Participation/training routes added; wider county coverage remains open.
Dated review history
Added a Denton newsroom notice for the City's scheduled October 27 public hearing on a proposed data-center moratorium. It links the official notice and participation rules, avoids claiming adoption, and leaves priority-town scores unchanged.
Added an Encinal newsroom record from the developers' September 30 Project Star announcement and the City's statement. It labels 6.47 GW generation, the adjacent 5 GW data-center campus, the investment figure and the 2029 initial generation target as proposed or anticipated, and links city and county meeting records. Permits, construction, operating power, hiring and delivered benefits remain unverified; priority-town scores remain unchanged.
Added a Jayton newsroom record from TDLR registrations TABS2027002494 and TABS2027002499. It totals the two filed square-footage and cost estimates, identifies the separate owner entities and unassigned tenants, and leaves construction, permits, power, operation and delivery unconfirmed. Added Kent County's official Commissioners Court agenda pathway; priority-town scores remain unchanged.
Added an official San Angelo status record after checking the City's current data-center information page. It distinguishes a possible site from a filed development application and directs readers to the City's source and public-records pathway. Town scores remain unchanged; the City page does not display a content-update date.
Added a Cedar Creek newsroom record from TDLR registration TABS2027002962. It labels the $366 million cost and November 30 start as filed estimates, identifies the unnamed tenant, and leaves construction and other approvals unconfirmed. Town scores remain unchanged.
Updated Taylor's October 8 newsroom record after CBS Austin reported a 5–0 Council vote approving the campus annexation and development agreement. The vote is attributed to reporting; the final adopted text, construction status and delivery of community commitments remain unchecked. Town scores remain unchanged.
Added a City of Taylor newsroom record for the proposed 664-acre Taylor Technology Campus development agreement ahead of the scheduled October 8 Council vote. The record labels the terms and community commitments as proposed and leaves town scores unchanged; Council action and delivery remain to be checked.
Added an official City of Abilene newsroom record for the adopted budget's expected $19.3 million one-time data-center construction sales-tax surplus and its one-time uses. The record distinguishes temporary construction-phase receipts from permanent operating revenue. Corrected the ERCOT voluntary RFI request deadline from October 4 to October 5 using the exact market notice; town scores remain unchanged.
Added an independent San Angelo riverfront concept gallery connecting careers, training, housing and family destinations. AI artwork, proposed themes and route feasibility are labeled; City May 7 planning announcement and Ziptrek Indianapolis precedent linked. Build, TypeScript and server-rendered route checks passed. Browser visual and client interaction QA remain unavailable. No town project status, promises, scores or external employment claims reverified.
Traced production datacenterstx.com to its ChatGPT Sites source repository, distinct from the small GitHub repository. Live Stripe API review confirmed the four active USD monthly standard prices, an enabled lifecycle webhook and period-end cancellation portal; no live Checkout sessions or subscriptions exist. Made all four public packages prominent. Server API key absent, sandbox not connected for hosted payment testing, and delivery/tax readiness gates remain unset. Payments remain disabled; provider-backed purchase completion is not claimed.
Scoped Boling source review added the Chronicle-reported September 8 groundwater milestone to the local page, city/map data and tracker. Authorized ceiling is separate from measured use, cooling-water authorization and unresolved power; prior directory history retained. September 8 official orders were not located in posted district records. Other market checks, baseline and scores unchanged.
Implemented live-only city ad placements and private 30-day recorded view/click reports. A separate live Stripe webhook was registered and its signing secret stored. Automated Worker/D1 checks cover payment eligibility, sandbox exclusion, city matching, expiry, dispute holds and duplicate metric prevention. Hosted browser and Stripe lifecycle verification remain open; the website server key is still missing and real billing remains disabled.
Created and API-verified five separate live monthly advertising prices ($25, $200, $300, $500 and $250 city banner) and stored their website mapping. Live billing remains disabled. Server credential, live portal/webhook, payment eligibility, hosted lifecycle tests and actual ad delivery/reporting remain open.
Restored campaign customer linkage and recurring terms consent after the Checkout Studio parameters-only change. Both existing provider-mocked billing tests passed, including renewal, failure, cancellation and credential gates. Hosted environment inspection confirms the server API key is absent; only sandbox Stripe access is connected. Real hosted payments, live delivery and reporting remain open. No live charges enabled; town checks unchanged.
Configured the owner-approved billing sign-in email and canonical checkout return address. Updated the existing sandbox webhook to datacenterstx.com and added owner-only configuration status without exposing secrets. The server API key, real hosted payment tests and live ad delivery/reporting remain open. No live charges enabled; town checks unchanged.
Built private advertiser approval and invitation flows, server-priced subscription checkout, invoices and portal access. Registered sandbox webhook and stored its signing secret. Tested provider-mocked payment, renewal, failure, duplicate/out-of-order handling, cancellation holds, risk review and school billing exemption in the Worker/D1 runtime. API credential and owner identity are still unconfigured; real Stripe end-to-end and paid delivery/reporting remain open. Historical town checks and scores unchanged.
Connected Stripe sandbox and created five monthly prices, a cancellation portal and a hosted test checkout with required recurring terms consent. Separate API fixture paid a $25 test invoice and accepted period-end cancellation scheduling. Hosted checkout completion, renewal and cancellation execution are unverified; website billing, delivery and reports remain pending. Town source checks and scores unchanged.
User approved monthly auto-renewing advertising and a $250/city primary banner. Updated offer, enquiry option and public terms; preserved standard rates and free school ads. Latest renewal decision supersedes earlier one-time invoices. Payment signup, cancellation portal, ad delivery and reports remain unconfigured; town source checks/scores unchanged.
Corrected the earlier pricing omission using the saved September 30 plan: $25/city, $200/10, $300/20 and $500/all current city pages per month. Restored free school/booster advertising and paid staffing policy. October 4 campaign-invoice choice supersedes automatic subscriptions; no payment collection or approval is implied. Verified package submissions and unchanged town checks.
Added advertiser campaign enquiries, private request storage, sponsorship boundaries and privacy terms. Billing remains in progress: no live payment collection, approved rates or automatic notifications. Town source checks and scores unchanged.
Verified current Prosper proposal withdrawal from the Town’s original notice graphic, corroborated official-account provenance and retained notice/agenda numbering discrepancy. Closed the past-date/outcome action with evidence. Rechecked three town milestone sources and retained local/portfolio and policy/construction distinctions. Prior outcome-review checks retained; town quality scores stay unchanged.
Completed a scoped outcome follow-up: hospital donation, later facility/infrastructure reports, TSTC cohort and registration sources, and Howard class page. Added separate Google recipient report, October 15 campus event and four open evidence questions. Previous opportunity assessment retained; scores unchanged because installation, placement and new class intake remain unverified.
Added a ten-record opportunity register, one visible Haskell employer listing, qualified vendor/training pathways and two recipient/provider community reports. Archived the preceding local-guide assessment. Scores remain 6 Meets standard and 15 Partial; unverified intake seats, bids, installation and employment outcomes receive no completion credit.
Added Haskell County and San Angelo five-question guides, dated source ledgers, local participation/training routes and two correction entries. Haskell outreach is company-attributed; recipient results remain open. All three local-guide checks now meet their stated criteria; no full-site accuracy or operating-status certification is claimed.
Corrected Prosper past-date wording with an explicit primary-outcome gap; published a correction register and dated Abilene project/local-pathway review. Two Abilene checks meet their stated criteria; operating outcomes, vacancies and the other towns remain open.
Established the initial content-inventory baseline: 7 measures across 3 towns. No check is certified as meeting the full standard; external factual and opportunity audits remain open.
Our direction and standards → · Submit a correction or evidence →